Working on an outbreak investigation is generally a difficult chore. First, you work under a lot of stress as you labor below a short deadline to find and submit the required findings. The worst-case scenario is when the lead team investigator divides the work and assigns shifts to the various members.
Doctors, nurses, researchers, and even the guardian may occasionally come into contact with the patient. For example, the nurses hold the person under research without using gloves. This can directly transfer the infection, which might affect other colleagues. Sometimes the same gloves are worn again, and the nurse takes them to different departments (Visualization, Infection Disease, 2014, para. 3). After the task is completed, it is recommended to discard the used gloves. Furthermore, the guardian does not adhere to the distance guidelines. Instead, they approach and even touch the patient. If they are not wearing protective clothing or gloves, this could be harmful.
I’ve been a part of many disease outbreak investigations involving airborne diseases. It wasn’t easy because you can only enter a room if you are fully covered. In addition, personal strict guidelines force your mind to be attentive in everything you do. There are surveys to complete, and everyone must submit their reports. After a few days, the team leader schedules a meeting to discuss the findings. If the compiled report is not persuasive, the poll will have to be repeated within a few days. To examine how they react to different doses, the patients you’re studying must follow the rules and regulations. It is necessary to keep track of any risk factors that may boost the infection rate.
Experimental epidemiology is one of the most common methods for lowering the virus’s risk. Only one nurse or doctor will draw blood from the patient; the test will be performed at the lab. Although direct observation can provide some hints about the disease’s symptoms, researchers must take some caution. Theoretical epidemiology is also employed in a variety of situations. First, the professionals assess the patients’ ailments using the knowledge they’ve gained from the literature. This is done once the patient’s signs and symptoms have been identified.
Reference
Visualization and analytics tools for infectious disease epidemiology: A systematic review (2014). Web.