Introduction
When the market is crowded, all businesses, no matter how big or small, have a hard time competing. As time goes on, the business will have to learn how to better structure its internal workings by identifying opportunities, creating goals, and making adjustments as needed. Organizations look for strategies to identify areas of improvement, value, and trash disposal as competition grows. As a result, a quality improvement plan is put into action. An organization’s distinction can be improved by implementing a quality improvement strategy (Steiss, 2019). There is much information at this point on how a company plans to manage quality in specific areas. The quality improvement plan will be tied to the areas that have been pinpointed. A quality improvement plan serves as a foundation for building and enhancing procedures in almost every company. The management should assess this every month to record accomplishments and lessons learned, as well as changes in the priority of the organization (Mang’eli and Kilika, 2018). Additionally, a good quality improvement strategy involves a plan of action, activities to be carried out in accordance with that action plan, an assessment of quality, and the implementation of metrics to enhance outcomes. This effective quality improvement strategy will result in improved quality, low prices, high production, less delivery time, staff morale, and minimal turnover if it is adopted.
A report on how Quality Tooling Company (QTC) can implement an organization-wide quality improvement strategy is the main goal of this paper. Quality Assurance (QA), Quality Control (QC), and Total Quality Management (TQM) in QTC will be the primary focus of the study. It will explore the influence of this approach on ensuring that the company’s culture of quality is maintained.
Goals and Objectives for Quality Improvement
Setting goals and objectives is the first and most important stage. Priorities are shaped by a clear set of goals and objectives (Mang’eli and Kilika, 2018). A quality improvement strategy is needed before QTC can begin work on its new intervention, which it will launch soon. According to international standards, goals must be quantifiable and in line with the organization’s commitment (De Carolis, Jeon and Kim, 2018). Predictability and less rework are the goals of QTC. Prioritizing risks and ensuring mitigation plans are in place is the goal of this process. There will be a focus on resource allocation, and a risk management strategy will be kept in an institutional repository. QTC focuses on training, delivery, and corrective measures monitoring and improvement. A complete supply chain performance appraisal system must be accessible in order to produce supplier scorecards and ease the engagement with suppliers. To guarantee that its medical equipment is always assembled in accordance with industry standards, QTC needs to implement a gauge calibration system.
Achieving the Goals and Objectives by Implementing the Strategy
Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) is a suitable paradigm and software for QTC to implement a value improvement strategy. The next phase is to design operations to implement APQP and satisfy QTC-defined aims and objectives. Implementation of APQP will be the initial step in the process, as described above. APQP’s ‘all in one’ nature makes it necessary to implement in an organization. A quality management plan for client satisfaction ought to be developed using APQP. TQM systems indicate that digitizing data and tracking it in real-time can generate long-term profitability (Mang’eli and Kilika, 2018). Because of APQP, quality efforts can be supported by appropriate representations and detection controls that meet QC criteria.
Companies working with significant delivery partners should maintain a Supplier Quality Management System (SQMS) to exceed customer expectations and assure QA within the organization. Such scenarios necessitate the usage of APQP to introduce a new product to the general audience (De Carolis, Jeon and Kim, 2018). QTC will use APQP as it expands its medical device business. Most of the QTC’s objectives will be achieved if APQA is put into practice. APQA software will be launched as part of the essential activities. The activity’s first phase is planning and definition. A systematic and structured approach for continuous improvement will be available to QTC as a part of TQM. A preliminary bill for medical device production will be presented at this juncture, along with QTC’s goals and objectives. Preliminary flow diagrams and the materials needed for medical device manufacturing will be created (Mang’eli and Kilika, 2018). Medical device production processes and assurance plans are part of the requirements.
Secondly, design work and development is the process of creating a finished product. This stage includes all aspects of QA, QC, and TQM to ensure customer satisfaction, achieve long-term objectives, and produce high-quality products. Data on the quality of QTC’s medical products will be presented for implementation in this step. The design failure mode will be examined, and a new strategy for device blueprint and manufacture will be developed (Agha et al., 2018). A prototype of the design will be built and tested, and QTC will apply its engineering expertise to refine the specs as needed. Process development and design is the third stage. Packaging standards and specifications for QTC’s medical devices will be made available in this phase. Before beginning the process of producing medical devices and instructions, the degree of quality and the technique will be examined. The process’ initial capability will be evaluated at some point.
Product and process verification is the fourth step. In QA and QC, there is a practice known as the Production Part Approval Process (PPAP). QTC will carry out trials on the medical equipment before launching, conduct system evaluations for future designs, and undertake a preliminary process capability analysis throughout this stage. In order to stimulate suppliers and their productions, QTC should build gadgets that are part of the PPAP supply chain (Harte et al., 2017). The ultimate design of the packages will be considered when QTC verifies the device’s functionality. A production control strategy will be used to ensure that devices continue to be manufactured. Feedback, appraisal, and corrective action form the fifth and final step in the QC process to guarantee the gadget meets its criteria. Customers’ pleasure and product variation are both parts of this process (Stamatis, 2018). There will be an evaluation of the documentation, including the document management framework and any course modifications. After completing these stages, QTC will adopt an APQP-based quality improvement plan and attain its aims and goals with minimal effort.
Strategy for Managing and Measuring Quality
A variety of tools and strategies are available for managing and evaluating quality efforts. It is known as a measurement of the condition in which operations, items, services, and networks are free of flaws and restrictions, as well as excluding those products that are not appreciated by the consumer (Stamatis, 2018). Since QTC has grown into a huge business, many models and key performance indicators will be used for management and measurement. Spotting internal and external threats and opportunities will be done using a SWOT analysis based on the model. QTC’s long-term aims and ambitions will be achieved because of this strategy (Boris and Ushvitsky, 2017). The strategic framework will help in determining why QTC exists, the quality objectives of the company, fundamental values, and the quality improvement strategic determination to address goals. It will facilitate implementation of the plan, changes needed within the process through feedback, strategic alignment of the medical device, and aspects that make QTC unique from other organizations.
The Five P’s concept, introduced in 1998, is a second way to gauge quality initiative. As a means of achieving long-term goals, the TQM model aims to drive a company toward performance excellence (Flynn et al., 2019). QA in QTC is defined by the five P model, which attempts to offer quality goods according to client needs. ‘Purpose,’ the first of the five Ps, is where QTC lays forth its overall objectives, mission, vision, and goals. The second P is ‘Principle’, which outlines QTC’s basic guidelines in order to ensure QC. It outlines the standards for how QTC should conduct its operations. The QTC system, procedure, production coordination, and infrastructure are all part of the third P, Process. The risk and QC indicators will be evaluated in order to withstand QC. The fourth P is People, a group of individuals who are dedicated to accomplishing organizational goals. Finally, Performance will be measured to evaluate QTC’s product metrics, assessments, and desired outcomes.
Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) Criteria is the third model. It is a tool for boosting the ability to compete. Understanding an organization’s underlying principles is essential to executing TQM and providing high-quality goods. Therefore, the MBNQA will apply QTC principles and values to derive results in seven areas, such as command structure, long-term planning for customers and markets, measurements and evaluation, and knowledge management, in order to create effective QA and TQM systems. It is vital for QTC to understand its basic values in order to connect them to the categories in the MBNQA model.
QC at QTC can be improved by the implementation of integrated systems such as ISO 9000 and ISO 14000. QTC will use this to create a control system that encourages the verification of product quality and identifies areas that fall short of predetermined standards. QTC can lessen the negative effects of its actions on the environment by adhering to the standard set by the International Organization for Standardization (Carey et al., 2018). QTC quality evaluation and compliance can make use of ISO 14000 and ISO 9000.
Effects of a Company’s Quality Culture
As the organization’s error margin shrinks, the likelihood of mistakes rises, making QC difficult to sustain. TQM’s long-term ambitions have been rendered unachievable because of this phenomenon. With so much pressure, businesses are experimenting with innovative ways to cultivate a workplace where employees regard quality as a personal priority. Employees who work in an organization with a high-quality culture are more likely to not only adhere to quality requirements but additionally take actions that are based on excellence (Mang’eli and Kilika, 2018). More than 60 percent of firms do not have a quality culture and only deal with 46 percent of everyday errors (Ross, 2017). The application of three fundamental organizational needs: QA, TQM, and QC, constitutes an effective quality of culture.
Maintaining a high-quality culture is essential to uncover anomalies in the strategic planning and execution of QC. In line with the requirements of QA and QC, the emphasis is placed on lower production costs and hassles in order to increase the trustworthiness of the message (Ross, 2017). Such data are used by the quality culture to ensure their long-term relevance. Employees should be motivated to produce performance initiatives as a part of QA by a quality culture that uses positive social pressure. The employee should be free to report any instances that do not meet the company’s standards to ensure excellent management. This creates a climate in which customers have less tolerance for quality issues, and employees see quality as a core value.
Evaluation Practices
QA, TQM system, and QC quality improvement plans involve quality evaluation activities to ensure that the process is being improved. Despite the fact that QTC has a wide variety of assessing activities, only three will be examined, and the best will be chosen. The Capability Maturity Model Integrated (CMMI) model is widely used in the software industry, which may be linked to QTC’s plan to implement APQP (De Carolis, Jeon and Kim, 2018). One starts at the bottom and works their way up through the stages of not having processes in place, repeating the procedure at the design stage, definable at the managerial phase, managed by providing metrics for the developments in place, and optimizing at the organizational level.
Test Maturity Model (TMM) measures the readiness and efficacy of quality improvement activities through a five-level system of evaluation. Test cases, plans, and strategies for QA are developed at this stage. Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) is used to integrate the advancement activities with TQM requirements (Keith, 2017). Finally, in the optimization stage, automation techniques are used to improve testing standards and procedures so that they can be implemented in a more efficient and timely manner. A quality management method known as six sigma aims to improve and minimize the occurrence of new deviations and hazards in the process of quality management. The six sigma model aids in the improvement of business processes and goods through the detection of faults, and its key goal is to enhance QC in the manufacture of products.
Conclusion
A value enhancement strategy is a critical component of an organization in ensuring that the company adheres to quality standards. There are several advantages to using a structured and formal strategy to examine present practice performance inside a company, as well as efforts to promote performance as competition intensifies. Since the industrial sector has long since supplanted the engineering industry, QTC has now had a chance to adopt a more progressive corporate philosophy for the modern day. It is time for QTC to make a public presence again, thanks to its strong staff and financial stability. To maintain the long-term viability of the company, QTC should first identify the areas of the product that require quality evaluation or implementation of an improvement procedure. The quality improvement strategy outlined above identifies all of QTC’s areas in need of value control. The aims and objectives of QTC have been established, which clearly demonstrates the requirement for built-in APQP software in the business. Though other software choices are available as QTC will be popularizing medical equipment, APQP will play a crucial role in reaching 50% of its aims and objectives. Product delivery time, cost, disruption, and risk are all reduced when APQP is used. Additional services include training, monitoring, and documenting. Because it is a medical device, it needs to meet all relevant industry requirements. In the optimization phase, automation practices facilitate improvement testing standards and methods for implementation in an efficient and opportune manner.
Recommendations
Attributable to the previously mentioned analysis, QTC can be advised to employ Gauge calibration and APQP installation. APQP software needs to be successfully installed by the company. Senior management support is required for each of the five steps in the installation process. As a result, senior managers, subcontractors, and the project’s owners should be urged to supervise and encourage the completion of each stage. QA teams ought to have access to relevant information, such as material costs and QA levels. QA teams should have access to prototypes and procedures for testing.
Prior to commercialization, it is recommended that QTC conduct product trials or distribute free samples to the medical community for input. The input will determine device validation, quality, and areas for improvement. A variety of methodologies and models can be used to manage and measure quality efforts. The management should consider QTC’s case and the five-point approach, as well as the MBNQA Criteria and ISO 9000. The five P framework and ISO 9000 should be employed with QTC’s long-term objectives in mind. Qualitative and quantitative data can be used to distinguish QTC from its competitors while applying the five P model to determine its status. Commercializing medical interventions requires the MBNQA model, and QTC is introducing medical gadgets, including handheld precision clinical equipment, with the support of this model. As a medical intervention, QTC cannot take any risk, so ISO 9000 is suggested for brand reputation and can be used following feedback assessments to verify product quality.
Current staff and new hires should all undergo training in preparation for QTC’s debut of APQP software and the launch of handheld precision medical equipment. Quality.co, a company that focuses on medical device training, is a good fit for QTC. Quality.co will exhibit quality improvement efforts by offering workshops and webinars for both public and private audiences. Preparation for implementation includes 40-90 minutes each week of online guidance sessions and workshops. In addition, new hires should receive step-by-step training on an individual’s preferred day. Throughout the entire strategy, QTC should hold regular updates meetings. QTC should encourage having preconstruction discussions and preparatory sessions among workers and top management. Updating procedures and generating assessment reports, as well as producing control reports and audits, are all intertwined. Regular sessions for monitoring should include these reports. TMM and Six Sigma models are recommended for process improvement. With the support of the SDLC and Six Sigma model, the TMM will assure the effective installation of APQP software, and these meetings will be used to monitor variances and risk in the process and reduce it. Consequently, the quality-improving strategy outlined above is ideal for QTC’s long-term growth.
Reference List
Agha, R. et al. (2018) ‘The SCARE 2018 statement: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines’, International Journal of Surgery, 60, pp. 132-136.
Boris, V. and Ushvitsky, L. (2017) ‘Strategic management in universities as a factor of their global competitiveness’, International Journal of Educational Management, 31(1), pp. 62-75.
Carey, R. et al. (2018) ‘Implementing a quality management system in the medical microbiology laboratory’, Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 31(3), pp. 2-17.
De Carolis, K., Jeon, B. and Kim, Y. (2018) ‘Applied practices of the Test Maturity Model (TMM) for small and midsize test organizations’, Journal of Engineering Technology, 6(2), pp. 157-171.
Flynn, R. et al. (2019) ‘Residential summer camp for youth with special needs: a longitudinal approach to investigating differences in social skills’, Children and Youth Services Review, 96, pp. 354-363.
Harte, R. et al. (2017) ‘A human-centered design methodology to enhance the usability, human factors, and user experience of connected health systems: a three-phase methodology’, JMIR Human Factors, 4(1), pp. 1-8.
Keith, L. (2017) Environmental sampling and analysis: a practical guide. London: Routledge.
Mang’eli, G. and Kilika, J. (2018) ‘Total quality management practices and operational performance of Nairobi Bottlers Limited, Kenya’, International Academic Journal of Human Resource and Business Administration, 3(3), pp. 356-374.
Ross, J. (2017) Total quality management: text, cases, and readings. 3rd edn. London: Routledge.
Stamatis, D. (2018) Advanced product quality planning: the road to success. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Steiss, A. (2019) Strategic management for public and nonprofit organizations. London: Routledge.