The classmate chose a grounded theory study involving qualitative telephone interviews. The study’s purpose was to determine interviewees’ reflections on a semi-structured phone meeting. The classmate stated the concept’s purpose, which helps in studying interactions to recognize and comprehend links between concepts and ideas. I agree with the classmate’s description of the assumption, which indicates that it is developed based on participants’ reality instead of theoretical speculation (Rebar & Gersch, 2015).
I agree with the classmate’s assessment of research design and data collection. Data relating to telephone use was obtained from the extensive study, and a thematic analysis was conducted. The data collection assessment is correct since the information was gathered for six and four months in 2014 and 2011, respectively (Ward, Gott & Hoare, 2015). Additionally, there were sixteen participants, and the average interview length was fifty-two minutes.
The classmate described material accumulation and methods correctly. However, the mentioned details are satisfactory but not enough. Sixteen participants took part in seventeen semi-structured interviews. The participants were recruited from a respiratory clinic of outpatients in Auckland, New Zealand. Participants’ purposive sampling was done at the study’s outset, followed by theoretical sampling. The cell phone discussions asked the participants’ opinions on the experience of not physically seeing an interviewer’s face and their thoughts on the level of disclosure compared to real physical interaction (Ward, Gott & Hoare, 2015). The interviews were recorded in audio format, and a verbatim transcription was done.
The research design and methods are great since the study effectively analyzes interactions such as interviews. The classmate presented the research findings briefly and successfully as the participants felt less inhibited and judged. The partakers had an excellent experience in the telephone interviews. Even a contributor who preferred face-to-face interaction acknowledged that the adventure was outstanding. The classmate’s assessment of the conclusion is exceptional. The study concludes that while no one opposes the importance of direct interviews, telephone meetings should be considered a second-best option due to resource or geographical constraints (Ward, Gott & Hoare, 2015). The classmate’s overall assessment of the article captures the essential information effectively.
Ward, K., Gott, M., & Hoare, K. (2015). Participants’ views of telephone interviews within a grounded theory study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(12), 2775-2785. Web.
Rebar, C. R., & Gersch, C. J. (2015). Understanding research for evidence-based practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health.