Ethics and customs are key sources of several social factors that have been affected. In a certain situation, we see a child falling sick but her parents refuse her to get medical treatment due to their ethical beliefs. It becomes quite difficult for the physicians to make decisions regarding her treatment. Obedience to taking medication as prescribed by doctors is influenced by personal views about one’s health condition. Therefore, it is advisable to take into consideration one’s principles when giving health guidance, including prescriptions, and also when providing them with treatment. Factors contributing to medical obedience include their cultural philosophies, health literacy, and personal opinions related to medication taking. Individual views about sickness include both intellectual and ardent signs.
Individual principles include the people’s theories about the sickness and its symptoms and several methods of its treatment, they are the duration of illness, the seriousness of the disease, its prevention, and its causes. In explaining well-being behaviors, social factors such as religiosity and sanctity have been progressively identified as influencing health and treatment. Religiosity and sanctity are very different concepts but are related in various ways. Sanctity describes inner self-determination to engross in faith and have a personal affiliation with a superlative being; God (Michon, 2017). On the other hand, religiosity refers to the outward devotion to the philosophies, does and rites related to the supernatural being, such as attending religious services and other activities linked to it.
Moral choices ought to regard the arrogance and standards of the patients. If patients clash with immunizations, treatments, or transfusion of blood for their kids, their beliefs have to be taken into account, even if the doctor will not ultimately follow the requirements. Regarding a victims preferences has an applied significance, as it is considered very important to consider a patient’s desire. Medics that domineer the victim at the end see the patient’s treatment fail. This is possible because the sick persons will be perhaps fighting them the whole way. When the patient’s relatives are distressed or disagree, the clear verdict is always not correct. Although doctors need to respect the patient’s values, their standards ought not control their conclusions. The patient’s desires come first before the doctor’s philosophies. Having a victim not being informed of a process can be accountable for negligence, unfluctuating if the process encounters all the criteria of medical maintenance (Kaplan & Castelo-Soccio, 2018). Morality and the spiritual confidence of the doctor are not supposed to domineer the victim’s desires to get the unsurpassed handling conceivable.
It is very important to accept and esteem that other people may as well have different impudence, standards, and principles than you. We do not have the right to expect that others can change their values, attitudes, and beliefs just because they are different from ours. This is because people’s ethics reflect their beliefs about what is right, what is wrong, and what is just. They respect other people’s autonomy, rights, and interests, do not categorize founded on their schedules, and make variations or compensations where necessary. This helps to build our interface with the world around us, enabling us to achieve kind-heartedness, empathy, trustworthiness, and personal responsibility. A patient who can defend his or her judgments has the right to make verdicts that do not confide with what the doctor trusts advantageous to that patient (Senicola et al., 2020). After all patient’s rights are a subcategory of human rights, including their habitual standards.
Kaplan, L., & Castelo-Soccio, L. (2018). When your patient’s parent asks: “My child’s alopecia areata is not getting better. Should he or she get tested for celiac disease?”. Pediatric Dermatology, 35(4), 535-538. Web.
Michon C. (2017). Believing God: an account of faith as personal trust. Religious Studies, 53(3), 387-401. Web.
Senicola, C., Smith, J., & Wilson, K. (2020). COVID-19 Has Changed Patient-Clinician Communication: What Can Rehabilitation Professionals Do to Enhance It?. HSS Journal ®, 16(S1), 141-145. Web.